Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by lab on Friday December 19, 2025 @04:59PM
(#46331446)
A lot of it was finger written -- curious which part sounded like LLM to you?
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by CallMeJim on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:18PM
(#46332112)
> > Here's something most developers overlook: if an LLM has a 2% JSON defect rate, and Response Healing drops that to 1%, you haven't just made a 1% improvement. You've cut your defects, bugs, and support tickets in half.
This sounds AI written.
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by nubg on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:58PM
(#46331948)
Meaning parts were LLM written? With no disclosure?
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by Sabinus on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:31PM
(#46332211)
"With no disclosure?"
Why do you have an expectation that a company will disclose to you when they use AI for their copywriting? Do you want them to disclose the software they used to draft and publish? If a manager reviewed the blog post before it went live?
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by curtisf on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:48PM
(#46332727)
Using words written by other people without disclosure has always been frowned upon. It's called plagiarism.
Plagiarism is bad for a lot of reasons, all of which also apply to the undisclosed use of generative AI.
The content of your posts is really insightful and interesting, but it's feel like junk quality because of the way LLMs write blogposts.
What was your prompt?