Stanley Kubrick held his own camera, so why shouldn’t you?

Re:Stanley Kubrick held his own camera, so why shouldn’t you? by nateberkopec on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @01:47PM (#4632953)

Kubrick also had an insane obsession with his tools. Most of Barry Lyndon was shot on F1.0 (EDIT: it was F0.7) glass, which, as far as I know, was only available from NASA at the time and probably can't be found at all today for film cameras.

EDIT: f/0.7, thanks! Holy shit!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stanley Kubrick held his own camera, so why shouldn’t you? by jeffreylo on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @01:51PM (#4632976)

http://fstoppers.com/stanley-kubrick-films-natural-candlelig...

[ Parent | on HN ]