News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes by Saris on Friday December 19, 2025 @11:06AM (#46327311)
Same problem I have with Debian.

At least Fedora just uses a version number!

Re:Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes by kevin_thibedeau on Friday December 19, 2025 @12:32PM (#46328502)
I like to think that Buster, Bullseye, and Bookworm was a ploy to make people more dependent on the version number.
Re:Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes by Saris on Friday December 19, 2025 @12:44PM (#46328639)
I work with Debian daily and I still couldn't tell you what order those go in. but Debian 12, Debian 13, etc.. is perfectly easy to remember and search for.
Re:Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes by marcosdumay on Friday December 19, 2025 @02:02PM (#46329586)
Debian is trying hard to switch to numbers. It's the user base that is resisting the change.

Maybe they should stop synlinking the new versions after 14, because AFAIK, they already tried everything else.

Re:Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes by Saris on Friday December 19, 2025 @02:47PM (#46330046)
Yeah if they just stopped using a release name that'd probably do it, although communities can be surprisingly stubborn on some things.