while they're definitely overdoing it, i'd say that picking on spelling, grammar etc instead of the content is also low effort
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI
by jennyholzer2 on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:14AM
(#46326066)
i'm right and he's mad
AI is for idiots
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI
by DonHopkins on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:17AM
(#46326094)
You sound quite mad by both meanings of the term.
And you just unwittingly proved my point, so I'm downgrading you to an 0.01x low effort Hacker News user.
If there are no other effects of AI than driving people like you out of the industry, then it's proven itself quite useful.
Edit: ok I will concede that point to you that I was mistaken about 0.01x, for candidly admitting (and continuously providing incontrovertible proof) that you're only a 0.001x low effort Hacker News user. I shouldn't have overestimated you, given all the evidence.
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI
by jennyholzer2 on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:24AM
(#46326176)
0.001x
As a 0.1x low effort Hacker News user who can't lift a pinky to press a shift or punctuation key, you should consider using AI to improve the quality of your repetitive off-topic hostile vibe postings and performative opinions.
Or put down the phone and step away from the toilet.