News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robot Vacuum Roomba Maker Files for Bankruptcy After 35 Y... by jonfw on Monday December 15, 2025 @01:28PM (#46278363)
In theory, sure. In practice? Chinese companies ignore your patent, you waste money suing, it takes a long time.

If you win? Good luck collecting damages from China, and have fun suing the next brand that starts selling the same machine in different plastic

Re:Robot Vacuum Roomba Maker Files for Bankruptcy After 35 Y... by keeda on Monday December 15, 2025 @03:07PM (#46279788)
That's why the ITC is so relevant here: it is relatively quite speedy compared to regular patent trials, and have the power to issue injunctions against imports (which is partly why it was relied on a lot during the smartphone patent wars.) So you may not collect damages from Chinese companies, but you can completely block their infringing imports into the US and deny them US revenue.
Re:Robot Vacuum Roomba Maker Files for Bankruptcy After 35 Y... by matsemann on Monday December 15, 2025 @04:24PM (#46280892)
Why isn't Amazon liable?
Re:Robot Vacuum Roomba Maker Files for Bankruptcy After 35 Y... by DANmode on Monday December 15, 2025 @11:20PM (#46284734)
$ -> Lobbyists. Legal firepower.

Or, said another way: unwillingness to enforce.