News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung might not have tried to copy the iPhone by enraged_camel on Monday October 08, 2012 @12:42PM (#4627639)
>>Certainly they copied some things, just as all companies copy good features from their competitors (this is a good thing; it's called progress).

You certainly have a very interesting definition for "progress."

Re:Samsung might not have tried to copy the iPhone by mistercow on Monday October 08, 2012 @04:16PM (#4628572)
No, I have a very mundane, standard definition of progress. One of the many negative effects of our society's pathological individualism is this idea that copying an idea is intrinsically immoral. In fact, copying is necessary to innovation and innovation is pointless without more copying.

Ever notice that basically all cars have 90% identical feature sets while only a small handful of special features differentiate any particular model from the rest of the market? How did that situation come about? Did God come down from heaven in 1970 with some stone tablets describing an AMC Pacer and declare "Here is the basic idea of the automobile. Now go forth and add superficial features to this design"?

Of course not. What happened was that manufacturers competed for many decades, incrementally adding new features. And when one manufacturer found a feature that succeeded in the market, other manufacturers copied it.

This is how technology advances: by building on past success.

Re:Samsung might not have tried to copy the iPhone by enraged_camel on Monday October 08, 2012 @08:06PM (#4629288)
I think you're a bit confused. There's a difference between copying and imitation. For example, all cars may have driver seats, but no two driver seats are identical. They all differ in material, shape, color, comfort, adjustability (or even adjusting mechanism)...

What does not lead to progress is imitation, where the feature in question is copied to be completely identical without any incremental improvements or adjustments for context.

Re:Samsung might not have tried to copy the iPhone by mistercow on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @10:48AM (#4631783)
Well, Samsung's products aren't even close to identical to Apple's, so there you have it.
Re:Samsung might not have tried to copy the iPhone by enraged_camel on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @12:45PM (#4632549)