Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?
by billy99k on Monday December 15, 2025 @08:20AM
(#46274145)
Would you also be open to paying taxes in your 401k yearly based on unrealized gains?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?
by tossandthrow on Monday December 15, 2025 @08:48AM
(#46274487)
In the country I live the 401k equivalent is taxed yearly on gains (and again as income when I retire), and I think that is fine - I get a world class society in return (you guessed right, it is a Nordic country)
so the answer is yes.
However, i did not go as far as proposing anything. You are assigning value on my statement.
I merely pointed out that it is a mute point to say that you can not use your unrealized gains.
Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?
by solumunus on Monday December 15, 2025 @11:56AM
(#46277012)
Of course, as long as the tax is progressive. Custodians of assets almost all charge an annual feel on unrealised gains, it’s hardly a foreign concept…
Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?
by pixl97 on Monday December 15, 2025 @08:27AM
(#46274233)
When those unrealized gains are spread across 10s-100s of millions of people it's fine because statistically gains are always being realized. As those holdings get further concentrated that stops happening.
Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?
by nullocator on Monday December 15, 2025 @11:28AM
(#46276636)
Absolutely, as long as billionaires, hedge funds, and vcs are also paying a progressive tax rate on their shares and holdings.