If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?

Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes? by legacynl on Monday December 15, 2025 @08:16AM (#46274105)

> I often ask myself whether that is ethical or not. But in the end, it’s not the tooling that’s unethical. Productivity increases are good for everyone, under normal circumstances.

So if I'm reading your comment right, you think it would be ethical under normal circumstances, but also believe we don't live under those normal circumstances? In that case i think the answer you're looking for is: it is not ethical to develop these tools under the current circumstances.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes? by haizhung on Monday December 15, 2025 @09:29AM (#46274996)

Interesting take. Not that I disagree, but it’s interesting to see that on HN.

Wouldn’t that mean that it’s unethical to work on anything that improves productivity? AI, in particular?

As long as (almost) all the benefits/wealth generated by your work is captured by the 0.1%?

Because that’s the case right now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes? by int_19h on Monday December 15, 2025 @02:20PM (#46279067)

The problem isn't the benefits per se, it's that the downsides are shouldered by everyone else while the benefits accrue to 0.1%. At which point it's just stealing from the commons.

[ Parent | on HN ]