Re:I Tried Gleam for Advent of Code, and I Get the Hype
by Capricorn2481 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @02:19PM
(#46265895)
A LOT of people, if you're paying attention. Why do you think that happened at their company?
It's not hard to find comments from people vibe coding apps without understanding the code, even apps handling sensitive data. And it's not hard to find comments saying agents can run by themselves.
I mean people are arguing AGI is already here. What do you mean who is normalizing this?
Re:I Tried Gleam for Advent of Code, and I Get the Hype
by blitz_skull on Sunday December 14, 2025 @06:49PM
(#46268461)
I fully believe there are misguided leaders advocating for "increasing velocity" or "productivity" or whatever, but the technical leaders should be pushing back. You can't make a ship go faster by removing the hull.
And if you want to try... well you get what you get!
But again, no one who is serious about their business and serious about building useful products is doing this.
Re:I Tried Gleam for Advent of Code, and I Get the Hype
by Verdex on Sunday December 14, 2025 @08:15PM
(#46269154)
> But again, no one who is serious about their business and serious about building useful products is doing this.
While this is potentially true for software companies, there are many companies for which software or even technology in general is not a core competency. They are very serious about their very useful products. They also have some, er, interesting ideas about what LLMs allow them to accomplish.
You should be reviewing everything that touches your codebase regardless of source.