News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by corimaith on Sunday December 14, 2025 @08:22AM (#46262831)
The writing quality and complexity of amateur content, even long-form is only around the level of a YA novel, truth be told alot of the stuff I was reading back in junior high in my school library had more depth than this.

It's good that you can get people reading, but reading the equivalent of pulp is very different from real novel that isn't so bounded by tropes or genre limits.

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by Kim_Bruning on Sunday December 14, 2025 @08:52AM (#46262974)
How can I forget Harry Potter And The Methods Of Rationality [1].

HPMOR is written by Eliezer Yudkowsky to promote rationalist concepts, and is somewhat influential in startup and AI circles.

Directly: Emmet Shear {co-founder of Twitch (YC S07)} is apparently superfan and gets a cameo.

So for once I get to post something that's almost on-topic for yc. :-P

[1] https://hpmor.com/

[2] https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/21/what-does-a-harry-potter-f...

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by beepbooptheory on Sunday December 14, 2025 @09:11AM (#46263101)
Maybe not the best thing for kids to be reading!

https://www.thecut.com/article/milo-youngblut-max-snyder-ziv...

Even without the, you know, murder stuff, I think we can do better for kids than another generation of "rationalists", considering the track record here.

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by onraglanroad on Sunday December 14, 2025 @01:02PM (#46265200)
> How can I forget Harry Potter And The Methods Of Rationality

If you find out, let me know. I wish I could.

I've never read such self absorbed drivel in my life. To be fair, I've not read any Ayn Rand, so I might be judging harshly.

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by Kim_Bruning on Sunday December 14, 2025 @08:30AM (#46262888)
90% of everything is crap.

  --Sturgeon's law.

Maybe even 99+% these days, seeing how easy it is to publish your first finger-painting online. Doesn't mean there isn't any good stuff, or even a lot of good stuff. 1% of a lot is still a lot.

(ps. and once you get people reading, they tend to keep doing it and develop taste over time. if it's even just a few who wouldn't have done it before. That's good, right?)

(pps. For example: at 2M words, I think pirateaba might exceed the "first 1M words are practice" threshold)

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by squigz on Sunday December 14, 2025 @08:37AM (#46262926)
Who cares? If people enjoy it, let them enjoy it. I've read a few YA novels as an adult that I enjoyed, even though I regularly read more complex stuff.

Most people, for most of history, have only ever enjoyed what might be considered "low quality" entertainment - pulp fiction, shitty plays, etc.

> real novel that isn't so bounded by tropes or genre limits.

Interestingly, even discounting YA and other stuff like that, you are only describing a very small subset of novels.

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by SubmarineClub on Sunday December 14, 2025 @10:31AM (#46263740)
>Who cares?

I do? Why would I want my kids to be consuming crap when they could be engaging with great works and high art?

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by pavel_lishin on Sunday December 14, 2025 @12:40PM (#46264983)
What if that's not the choice? What if the choice is "engage with art they enjoy and appreciate, or not at all"?
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by Telaneo on Sunday December 14, 2025 @01:01PM (#46265189)
They're great works to you, and a slog to them.

They can read Minecraft strategy guides and Yahoo auction fan fics for all I care, since that's a lot better than nothing. I remember not wanting to read what school assigned me and how that killed my desire to read most fiction writing, and would prefer that not happen to more kids.

Art is a matter of taste, and if you go counter to your audience's taste, don't be surprised if they disengage.

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by squigz on Sunday December 14, 2025 @01:25PM (#46265427)
Because what constitutes "crap" and "great works and high art" is highly subjective both to personal tastes and the culture of the time.
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by Aerroon on Sunday December 14, 2025 @03:06PM (#46266323)
If the works are so great then you've got nothing to worry about. Kids will read them on their own. Of course we both know that's not true, because the works are not that great.
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by TitaRusell on Sunday December 14, 2025 @10:41AM (#46263820)
Jane Austen was considered pulp. So was Charles Dickens. And Conan Doyle.

Nobody considered those high literature back in the day!

Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by ThrowawayR2 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @12:01PM (#46264561)
That cherry picks the best of the best without comparing them with the other 99.9% of their contemporaries who were pulp authors. They and their literary output are forgotten for good reasons.
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by squigz on Sunday December 14, 2025 @01:24PM (#46265421)
I don't think GP is cherrypicking anything; rather, illustrating how what is seen as slop one day may be seen as "great works" down the road.
Re:Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class by ThrowawayR2 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @03:34PM (#46266591)
Are you suggesting Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, or Conan Doyle were considered slop during their own lifetimes? If not, my point stands.