News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If a Meta AI model can read a brain-wide signal, why woul... by bitwize on Sunday December 14, 2025 @02:15AM (#46261345)
When improper use of a statistical model generates bogus inferences in generative AI, we call the result a "hallucination"...
Re:If a Meta AI model can read a brain-wide signal, why woul... by baq on Sunday December 14, 2025 @05:23AM (#46262082)
It should have been called confabulation, hallucination is not the correct analog, tech bros simply used the first word they thought of and it unfortunately stuck.
Re:If a Meta AI model can read a brain-wide signal, why woul... by K0balt on Sunday December 14, 2025 @07:28AM (#46262570)
Undesirable output might be more accurate, since there is absolutely no difference in the process of creating a useful output vs a “hallucination” other than the utility of the resulting data.

I had a partially formed insight along these lines, that LLMs exist in this latent space of information that has so little external grounding. A sort of deeamspace. I wonder if embodying them in robots will anchor them to some kind of ground-truth source?

Re:If a Meta AI model can read a brain-wide signal, why woul... by lgas on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:37AM (#46324692)
I was referring to the dead salmon in the study seeming to show increased activation in the brain and spinal coord.