Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by systemtest on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:39PM
(#46258918)
I have been thinking about it but it is tricky from a legal standpoint. What I'm trying to arrange next time I visit is to have a secondary line installed at my parents place that is in my name. So that when I pull heavy traffic from that line it doesn't impact them and I can't get them in trouble for posting a message that isn't government approved.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by xandrius on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:55PM
(#46259038)
Heavy traffic to access a bunch of gov websites? There's definitely more to your story then.
I'd say, anything heavy and random, use the general VPN and the rest use an rpi at your parents' home.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by JSR_FDED on Saturday December 13, 2025 @08:11PM
(#46259924)
No it’s his parents who don’t want him interfering with their thriving warez empire
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by systemtest on Sunday December 14, 2025 @02:21PM
(#46265911)
I don’t do FXP anymore :)
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by Aurornis on Saturday December 13, 2025 @07:00PM
(#46259471)
> Heavy traffic to access a bunch of gov websites? There's definitely more to your story then
They used government websites as an example, not to say that all of their traffic was to government websites.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by inemesitaffia on Sunday December 14, 2025 @02:11AM
(#46261334)
Video. Live video