Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by Scoundreller on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:54PM
(#46259027)
Damn, I’m throwing away hundreds of dollars per month.
And I can get a semi-anonymous cable internet connection too (if your line is “hot”, you could sign up with any address… not sure if it has to be under the same node or just the same city). Would be difficult, but not impossible, to track down which residence the shadow connection is coming from.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by nemomarx on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:10PM
(#46258648)
Is this be cause they're paying the residential proxy owners some of it?
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by bakugo on Saturday December 13, 2025 @06:20PM
(#46259194)
Most of the people whose devices and connections are being used as residential proxy exit nodes are not aware of it.
They likely charge per GB because these residential connections are slow and limited compared to datacenter connections (doesn't help that they're often located in third world countries), and are often used for aggressive scraping, so charging a fixed monthly price would not be viable.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by h33t-l4x0r on Sunday December 14, 2025 @04:07AM
(#46261803)
Probably safe to assume that yours is. Especially if a teenager is using your wifi.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by aryonoco on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:55PM
(#46259041)
I can assure you they are not.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by whatevermom2 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @01:20AM
(#46261171)
Prices are more in the 0.30$-0.45$ range if you know where to go, from my experience.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits
by Footprint0521 on Monday December 15, 2025 @12:54AM
(#46270919)
Where do you go?
For residential IPs you can't even pay per month like normal VPNs, normally they charge per GB, usually over $2 usd per GB.