We collected 10k hours of neuro-language data in our basement

Re:We collected 10k hours of neuro-language data in our base... by devanshp on Monday December 08, 2025 @01:46PM (#46196055)

Cool post! I'm somewhat curious whether the data quality scoring has actually translated into better data; do you have numbers on how much more of your data is useful for training vs in May?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We collected 10k hours of neuro-language data in our base... by rio-popper on Monday December 08, 2025 @02:03PM (#46196257)

so the neural quality real-time checking was the most important thing here. Before we rewrote the backend, between 58-64% of participant hours were actually usable data. Now, it's between 90-95%

If you mean the text quality scoring system, then when we added that, it improved the amount of text we got per hour of neural data by between 30-35%. (That includes the fact that we filter which participants we have return based on their text quality scores)

[ Parent | on HN ]