Re:The C++ standard for the F-35 Fighter Jet [video]
by treyd on Monday December 08, 2025 @01:03AM
(#46188913)
You're not supposed to question the wisdom of the Go developers. They had a very good reason for making unused variables be an unconfigurable hard error, and they don't need to rigorously justify it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The C++ standard for the F-35 Fighter Jet [video]
by FieryMechanic on Monday December 08, 2025 @06:39AM
(#46191136)
Warnings are often ignored by developers unless you specifically force warnings to be compile errors (you can do this in most compiler). I work on TypeScript/C# code-bases and unless you force people to tidy up unused imports/using and variables, people will just leave them there.
This BTW can cause issues with dependency chains and cause odd compile issues as a result.
Re:The C++ standard for the F-35 Fighter Jet [video]
by account42 on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @05:36AM
(#46203419)
> Warnings are often ignored by developers unless you specifically force warnings to be compile errors (you can do this in most compiler).
Not my experience. Find better managers.
Re:The C++ standard for the F-35 Fighter Jet [video]
by FieryMechanic on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @06:19AM
(#46203625)
>Not my experience
The point being conveyed is your experience is not representative of what commonly occurs. I have worked as a contractor in a number of different orgs both small, large, private and public and more often than not unless you force people to fix these things, they won't.
> Find better managers.
How about you and others with similar attitudes realise that the world isn't perfect and sometimes you have to work with what you got.
Do you think I haven't been looking for a new position? Most of the jobs in my area are going to be more of the same.