News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Carrier-grade NAT: The Killer of the "Homelab" by vercaemert on Sunday December 07, 2025 @05:22AM (#46180666)
Interestingly, you say this. During my AI-driven research that led me toward tunnels, I found that VPN was the less secure approach.

For SSH/Mosh, for example, I chose a WARP tunnel. I set it up with a certificate that expires immediately after each connection. My MFA was explicitly limited to password and Duo SSO Push.

As I mentioned, though, my decision was primarily based on an Agent Mode prompt to ChatGPT, so I'm far from an expert.

Re:Carrier-grade NAT: The Killer of the "Homelab" by wkat4242 on Sunday December 07, 2025 @12:51PM (#46183544)
Why would a VPN be less secure? It's an extra hurdle for attackers to take. You can still use whatever authentication you can on the service. And with a mesh VPN you also don't need to open any ports.

However when I look into it it seems like WARP is also a vpn-like service, just a cloud one. Also, I do self-hosting so a "cloud native" solution as cloudflare calls it is explicitly not what I want. If your homelab is all about cloud then of course you would want something like this.

Re:Carrier-grade NAT: The Killer of the "Homelab" by vercaemert on Sunday December 07, 2025 @02:03PM (#46184136)
My concern was specifically about other devices on the same home network, outside the homelab, becoming vulnerable.

I don't remember the details. Not relevant to you if you don't want to use cloud-native services.

Personally, I like proprietary security-oriented code where possible, cloud-native or not. That factored into the decision.

Re:Carrier-grade NAT: The Killer of the "Homelab" by GauntletWizard on Sunday December 07, 2025 @04:11PM (#46185191)
[delayed]