News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Plane crashed after 3D-printed part collapsed by michaelt on Friday December 05, 2025 @03:32AM (#46158086)
It sounds like it was something like PLA when it was supposed to be ABS.

According to https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69297a4e345e3...

> The aircraft owner [...] understood from the vendor that it was printed from CF-ABS (carbon fibre – acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) filament material, with a glass transition temperature of 105°C [...] he was satisfied the component was fit for use in this application when it was installed.

> [...] Two samples from the air induction elbow were subjected to testing, [...] The measured glass transition temperature for the first sample was 52.8°C, and 54.0°C for the second sample.

I've known 3D printing folks who run off a throwaway prototype in a cheap, easy-to-print material to check for fit before printing in more difficult, expensive materials. Easy to imagine a careless manufacturer getting the PLA prototype mixed in with the ABS production parts, and selling it by mistake.

Of course, the aviation industry usually steers clear of careless manufactures....

Re:Plane crashed after 3D-printed part collapsed by Ancapistani on Friday December 05, 2025 @03:37AM (#46158121)
That's... absurd. ABS is a terrible choice for anything in an engine bay - ABS breaks down over time when in contact with oils.

I've used PA6-CF for similar purposes in the past. Obviously not for aircraft, though.

Re:Plane crashed after 3D-printed part collapsed by poulpy123 on Friday December 05, 2025 @06:09AM (#46159713)
Even in ABS I would not use something 3D printed on a consumer machine as a critical part of an airplane.
Re:Plane crashed after 3D-printed part collapsed by Doxin on Monday December 08, 2025 @08:01AM (#46191712)
You'd be very hard pressed to confuse PLA with carbon fiber reinforced ABS. The latter has a definite surface texture that's hard to get confused with that of PLA.