News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by ravenical on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:25PM (#46138035)

  continue was called loop for some reason
How strange! Does anyone know why?
Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by steveklabnik on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:52PM (#46138395)
There was an early rule that Rust keywords should be five characters or less. I would guess it's because of this rule. I believe loop turned into cont to satisfy this rule, and then eventually we relaxed the rule, and it became continue.
Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by iknowstuff on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @02:39PM (#46138983)
Whoa, do you know who and why came up with that? So strange, making it less readable on purpose?
Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by steveklabnik on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @03:19PM (#46139536)
IIRC it was just a personal preference of Graydon's back then. I'm also not sure it was intended to live forever, just something to try and nudge things in a particular direction.

Terseness doesn't inherently mean less readable.

I do think that that rule is probably not one that would be good permanently.

Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by Defletter on Thursday December 04, 2025 @06:50PM (#46154962)
Probably for the same reason that most new language these days cannot bring themselves to just use "function" and instead have "fn", "fun", "func", etc. It's a headlong pursuit of conciseness for the sake of conciseness.
Re:A Look at Rust from 2012 by kuresov on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:34PM (#46138148)
I could see it… like “loop back around” or “continue loop”. I think good old “continue” is better and more familiar though :)