News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruine... by ncruces on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @05:58AM (#46133009)
> The Go reviewers are also more likely than usual to assume you're incompetent if your PR comes from Github

I've always done it that way, and never got that feeling.

Re:Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruine... by arccy on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @06:30AM (#46133268)
there's certainly a higher rejection rate for github PRs
Re:Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruine... by foldr on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @07:22AM (#46133695)
That seems unsurprising given that it’s the easiest way for most people to do it. Almost any kind of obstacle will filter out the bottom X% of low effort sludge.
Re:Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruine... by PunchyHamster on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @12:31PM (#46137356)
correlation, not causation.

Lowest common denominator way will always get worst quality

Re:Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruine... by arccy on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @04:58PM (#46140773)
sure it's correlation, but the signal-to-noise ratio is low enough that if you send it in via github PR, there's a solid chance of it being ignored for months / years before someone decides to take a look.