News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Framework Computer Now Sponsoring LVFS / Fwupd Development by fluidcruft on Saturday November 29, 2025 @08:50PM (#46092790)
I asked for evidence that Framework supports this. If you check the post it's a thread about Framework. This is line noise not even worth thinking about unless you have something showing Framework supports this.

If you have nothing actually relevant to Framework (as it seems) maybe you should think about the four wise monkeys.

Re:Framework Computer Now Sponsoring LVFS / Fwupd Development by fragmede on Saturday November 29, 2025 @09:05PM (#46092868)
Oh I misread your comment. I don't have anything. No tweets from Framework, nothing in their forum, nothing on this very thread where Framework employees are active to denounce DHH or Mr. Robinson.

Sometimes, silence speaks volumes.

Re:Framework Computer Now Sponsoring LVFS / Fwupd Development by fluidcruft on Saturday November 29, 2025 @09:19PM (#46092963)
Why do you think you are entitled to an answer to a loaded question?

"Does XYZ respond to loaded questions?" is nowhere near any rubric I use for evaluating anything. Only those with guilty conscience engage in this bullshit. The innocent are wise enough to ignore it.

And now fragmede would you mind telling us when you stopped curbstomping the unhomed?

Re:Framework Computer Now Sponsoring LVFS / Fwupd Development by fragmede on Sunday November 30, 2025 @08:00PM (#46102216)
Last Wednesday, because it was raining.

It’s not about a loaded question. It’s about accountability. Framework is actively in this thread, and has made no attempt to distance itself from DHH’s statements. That’s a data point whether you like it or not. Silence isn’t proof, but it is signal when a company’s brand is directly implicated.

Re:Framework Computer Now Sponsoring LVFS / Fwupd Development by fluidcruft on Sunday November 30, 2025 @10:24PM (#46103175)
Demanding accountability of someone for something you admit they have not done is particularly Kafkaesque.