News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written by AI by hyperadvanced on Saturday November 29, 2025 @12:24PM (#46089166)
Why do you need proof anyway? Do you need proof that sentences are poorly constructed, misleading, or bloated? Why not just say “make it sound less like GPT” and let them deal with it?
Re:Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written by AI by circuit10 on Saturday November 29, 2025 @12:44PM (#46089326)
You can have sentences that are perfectly fine but have some markers of ChatGPT like "it's not just X — it's Y" (which may or may not mean it's generated)
Re:Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written by AI by hyperadvanced on Saturday November 29, 2025 @03:37PM (#46090568)
Isn’t that kind of thing (reliance on cliché) already a valid reason for getting marked down?
Re:Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written by AI by chdjdbdbfjf on Saturday November 29, 2025 @02:29PM (#46090077)
Are you AI? Usually only Claude misses the point so completely.