News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by dpark on Friday November 28, 2025 @06:05PM (#46083592)
I’m not really sure about that. I think if I told most people in my social circles that, they would look at me like I’m very weird.

I’m not necessarily saying they are wrong either. It’s a tough zone. If I imagine people I know saying that to me, in my head most of them come off lecherous and creepy.

I feel like close friends could say that stuff to me or vice versa but most of the time it would come off weird at best. Choice of words is also a big factor though. “Beautiful”, “gorgeous”, “attractive” are all more reasonable sounding to me than “hot” even though they all basically mean the same thing.

Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by gbnwl on Friday November 28, 2025 @08:04PM (#46084347)
> In my head most of them come off lecherous and creepy.

Wait really, just for thinking someone is hot and telling you, who's presumably their friend?

Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by dpark on Saturday November 29, 2025 @12:32AM (#46085375)
I’ve got friends that I’ve known for decades and would fly across the world if they needed. I’ve also got friends I see for drinks occasionally. Other people I might call friends that I don’t even have in my phone. It’s a big range and there are a lot of things my closest friends could reasonably say to me that more casual friends couldn’t.

To be clear, I’m also not saying anyone would ostracized for this, nor that anyone would ostracize me if I said this. But if one of my more casual friends randomly commented that their hairdresser is hot, I’d give them a bit of a sideways look, yeah.

Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by Dusseldorf on Friday November 28, 2025 @09:33PM (#46084776)
I think it's a product of the environment. I've lived some places (lower middle class suburban factory towns) where that sort of conversation wouldn't have been uncommon at all. I've lived other places (upper middle class university towns) where it definitely would've gotten you some strange looks or distancing. The 99.9999% number definitely doesn't ring true to me.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by zmgsabst on Friday November 28, 2025 @10:59PM (#46085080)
This seems like it’s very prone to selection bias. I don’t think most acquaintances I have would be surprised or cut me off; and indeed, I’ve exchanged comments about passing women with people I’ve only met recently.

But that’s why I think it’s self selection:

- you mention that even from friends you would find it strange and seem to flock with similar perspectives;

- by contrast, I don’t and flock with people who don’t either.

And I don’t particularly see a problem with that — the world is a big place and not everyone needs to be to everyone else’s taste. But like many things, people seem to form cliques.

Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by dpark on Saturday November 29, 2025 @12:33AM (#46085377)
For sure. Selection bias is major here. But I don’t think someone having a negative reaction to this scenario is a 1 in a million chance.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot... by scotty79 on Saturday November 29, 2025 @06:18AM (#46086715)
> would look at me like I’m very weird.

Discussing sex in non-sexual contexts is weird. Author goes at length how it was a private, personal experience in her own body and mind. And if it stayed there instead of being babbled out to a friend she would still have that friend.