Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by kenjackson on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @12:22PM
(#4608190)
If the author searched for John Hancock Center on Bing (which is the actual name, not the John Hancock Building), he would have not only got the right building, but he would have gotten Venue Maps for the inside of the building.
As someone else noted... he doens't use the term "John Hancock Building" or "John Hancock Center" consistently, which you can see from the screenshots.
He used "Building" for Bing and Mapquest (neither found it). He uses the term "Center" for Waze, Google, and Nokia (they all found it).
I'd suggest the author use the same search term for all tests if he wants to draw reasonable conclusions.
Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by muzzamike on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @12:44PM
(#4608329)
While I agree the author should use the same search terms for each test (which he very well may have), Bing should still be capable of finding the "John Hancock Center" with a search for the "John Hancock Building".
A quick check verifies that Google Maps recognized both. It's little things like these that make the experience less painful.
Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by cktse on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @01:41PM
(#4608628)
If US experience is subpar, international is even worse. Take HK for example, iOS 6 Maps doesn't even come with basic street numbers! To add to the insult, just try searching for "Hong Kong" on Waze, for a laugh... Yes the deformed blob is meant to be HK! Obviously Tim Cook never tested international searches before recommending it...
Commercially this just doesn't make sense given China is the fastest growing market for Apple.
Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by dpcx on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:57AM
(#4608047)
I've been using Waze pretty heavily for almost 3 years, and have only had problems with it very early on, when it didn't have great road connection data.
The fact that I can contribute corrections to the data set makes it a win for me.
Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by acomjean on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @01:21PM
(#4608522)
I second Waze. Its replaced my GPS, a mr T voiced TomTom (Mr T yelling directions at you is awsome...) Only one problem years ago when Waze couldn't give me directions. Its gotten a lot better as more have used it. There are enough drivers using it that don't feel I'm testing the roads for all the drivers behind me anymore.
Re:Replacing iOS 6 Maps: Hands-on with MapQuest, Bing, Waze,...
by twodayslate on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @02:11PM
(#4608809)
I like Waze for when I drive because it gives you pretty accurate traffic and police reports. Of course this is all socialized so if you live in a less populated area these features become less useful.
As someone else noted... he doens't use the term "John Hancock Building" or "John Hancock Center" consistently, which you can see from the screenshots.
He used "Building" for Bing and Mapquest (neither found it). He uses the term "Center" for Waze, Google, and Nokia (they all found it).
I'd suggest the author use the same search term for all tests if he wants to draw reasonable conclusions.
A quick check verifies that Google Maps recognized both. It's little things like these that make the experience less painful.
Commercially this just doesn't make sense given China is the fastest growing market for Apple.
All in all, a very disappointing user experience.
Of course, Waze seems to be unabashedly car-oriented, not really a general mapping service—and nobody in their right mind drives in Hong Kong...
The fact that I can contribute corrections to the data set makes it a win for me.