News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by carlmr on Thursday November 27, 2025 @01:51AM (#46066471)
>A pity. Saw Zig as something rising but with this kind of toxicity, no thanks.

Don't get me wrong, it is a bit toxic. However, I feel like taking one comment in a larger article and blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic.

Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by amake on Thursday November 27, 2025 @02:45AM (#46066781)
> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic

One person decided that something wasn't for them. How is that in the same league as someone in a leadership position being unprofessional?

Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by carlmr on Thursday November 27, 2025 @04:08AM (#46067320)
I personally don't care too much for hierarchies, so I didn't factor this in. You can be toxic at any level.
Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by amake on Thursday November 27, 2025 @05:57AM (#46068049)
> You can be toxic at any level

And yet the context is extremely important.

> I didn't factor this in

That's how you get to false equivalencies.

Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by carlmr on Thursday November 27, 2025 @10:54AM (#46070398)
>That's how you get to false equivalencies.

No, you're just putting something into it which doesn't matter to me. Not a false equivalency.

Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg by amake on Thursday November 27, 2025 @11:06PM (#46075409)
You said:

> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic

Making a false equivalency of the supposed toxicity of the commenter's post and the toxicity displayed in the article.

You can just take the L; you don't have to be performatively obtuse about it.