Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by ImPostingOnHN on Wednesday November 26, 2025 @12:14AM
(#46054406)
If you bring a dog in, you cannot be sued for any sort of tort relating to breach of contract. At most, you could be asked to leave, and sued for damages if the dog broke something or someone.
Please don't attack others, and in general, it's not a good idea to use terms like Dunning-Kruger when you are incorrect. Ad blocking is not piracy under any statuatory or case law, period.
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by jemmyw on Wednesday November 26, 2025 @04:32AM
(#46055745)
As far as I can find, in the US and the UK, conditions of entry to a business are considered an implied license and not an implied contract because there's no mutual intent to form a binding legal agreement. A business can revoke the license and trespass you, but they cannot sue you for breach of contract.
A unilateral contract requires some kind of "promise accepted through performance"
I note that this does appear to be different under Australian law, if that is where you're from, although it's still not a unilateral contract.
It's literally a legal contract, under contract law. It's called a unilateral contract.
I didn't expect a Dunning-Kruger effect on NH, but here we are.