Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3

Re:Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3 by psychoslave on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @05:24AM (#46044430)

It’s good at quickly producing a lot of code which is most likely going to give interesting results, and it’s completely unaware of anything including why human might want to produce code.

The marketing bullshit that it’s a "thinking" and "hallucinating" is just bringing the intended confusion on the table.

They are great tools for many purpose. But a GPS is not a copilot, and an LLM is not going to replace coworkers where their humanity matters.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3 by Madmallard on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @06:26AM (#46044777)

I mean is it really that interesting if it completely falls flat and permanently runs in unfulfilling circles around basically any mild complexity the problem introduces as you get further along solving it, making it really hard to not feel like you need to just do it yourself?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3 by psychoslave on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @08:45AM (#46045719)

I would say yes, it’s an interesting tool.

For one thing, it’s far more interesting than a rubber duck in many cases. Of course on that matter in the end it’s about framing the representation adequately and enter a fictional dialog.

[ Parent | on HN ]