Just distill their models completely. They have no moral high-ground at all there.
What? What are you even talking about? There's no way to control for exposures to hundreds of thousands of new chemicals in our environment and foods. LITERALLY NO WAY TO CONTROL. Did you know air pollution contributes?
What real doctors are you talking about? You are going up some branch where it's not even misaligned with what I'm talking about you just clearly aren't deep in this subject at all.
"> There's way too much shit in our environment
Sure. And it’s probably harmful. But it doesn’t cause everything.
Cigarettes cause cancer. Cigarettes are bad. That doesn’t mean the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs was caused by cigarettes, and anyone saying that makes no sense is a tobacco shill."
Okay The Plant Slant.
"> our resilience is suffering
Suffering resilience is a weird way to describe allergies."
1.) Not talking about just allergies here 2.) You clearly do not know much about allergies. Do you know anything about the gut microbiome or intestinal lining and how things in our environment, medications, and in our foods contributes to affecting it and those associations with the development and alteration of allergies?
Waiting eagerly for your reply where you just copy-pasted my reply to an LLM to get a synopsis and add your own personal snark to it.
I've been suffering from a condition since around 2014 perhaps longer, that seemingly started after taking antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, Rocephin, Fosfomycin) where my body just loses tolerance to everything I continually ingest. What that looks like is something like an allergy, but my IgE testing on foods is all normal. For years doctors told me I was having panic attacks when I ate which...
So it's not really a surprise our food and drink quality and safety would suffer alongside that
It's probably going to get worse
Maybe in 10 years when frontier-level models are easily usable and not locked down by the government and PVP between the companies and everyone else to justify their existence and take all the resources from everyone.
Maybe then it'll accelerate development.
Like when people bring this up as if it's somehow just like acceptable.
It's not at all. That's utter bullshit. The people that run the courts have been bought out. They have no idea what the far-reaching consequences of this is.
They shouldn't be.
and if they did for your system, then it's so simple that whether or not you used AI doesn't even really matter
You just fly in from astroturfer kookoo town or what?
Everyone in advanced math research understands the topics they are reading about deeply.
This person is just literally being victimized by the AI incompetence apocalypse.
Information overload + trained laziness.
All this anthropomorphism of literal statistical text generators.
Yes they exhibit generated sentences of text that describe coherent responses about a topic when there's an inordinate amount of research material in the training data from which they are distilling sentences of sound and rational thought. That's the ONLY way it can possibly work. There are so many scenarios where the training data isn't setup like that and low and behold the generated responses are just literal garbage.
"Strict rules" does so much heavy-lifting in what you said that it basically decides whether it applies to any reasonable complex system or is pointless and just worked on your constrained system and wouldn't translate to much else that isn't like directly related or analogous.
Doubt!
Sounds like utter bull-crap!
morality is completely out the window
Guard-rails are totally ineffective
Company stock value goes up when they lay off staff. Next quarter shareholder maximization is the goal. AI and layoffs is the strategy to get there.