Do they? Do people report that an HDR image on a web page that takes up roughly 10% of the screen looks more realistic? Do they report that an HDR YouTube video, which mostly consists of a screen recording with the recorded SDR FFF being mapped to the brightness of the sun, looks pretty? Do people like when their light-mode GUI suddenly turns grey as a part of it becomes 10x the brightness of what used to be white? (see e.g https://floss.social/@mort/115147174361502259)

Because that's what HDR web content is.

HDR movies playing on a livingroom TV? Sure, nothing against that. I mean it's stupid that it tries to achieve some kind of absolute brightness, but in principle, some form of "brighter than SDR FFF" could make sense there. But for web content, surrounded by an SDR GUI?

> when their light-mode GUI suddenly turns grey as a part of it becomes 10x the brightness of what used to be white

I don't know why you're asking me about examples that violate the rules I proposed. No I don't want that.

And obviously boosting the brightness of a screen capture is bad. It would look bad in SDR too. I don't know why you're even bringing it up. I am aware that HDR can be done wrong...

But for HDR videos where the HDR actually makes sense, yeah it's fine for highlights in the video to be a little brighter than the GUI around them, or for tiny little blips to be significantly brighter. Not enough to make it look gray like the misbehavior you linked.

> I don't know why you're asking me about examples that violate the rules I proposed. No I don't want that.

Other than the exaggerated 10x, I don't understand how it violates the rules you proposed. You proposed a scheme where part of the screen should be allowed to be significantly brighter than the surrounding SDR GUI's FFF. That makes the surrounding GUI look grey.

> And obviously boosting the brightness of a screen capture is bad. It would look bad in SDR too. I don't know why you're even bringing it up.

I'm bringing it up because that's how HDR looks on the web. Most web content isn't made by professional movie studios.

The example video I linked conforms with your suggested rules, FWIW: most of the image is near black, only a relatively smart part of it is white. The average brightness probably isn't over SDR FFF. Yet it still hurts.

The whole chip in the middle is brighter than white. Half that video is super bright, making this example way more than I was suggesting in both area and average brightness.

> most of the image is near black, only a relatively smart part of it is white. The average brightness probably isn't over SDR FFF.

It's a lot more than I suggested, and I said average brightness half of FFF for my example.

Also if I knew you were going to hammer on the loose example numbers I would have said 2% or 1%.

> I'm bringing it up because that's how HDR looks on the web.

But I'm not defending how it looks. I'm defending how it could look, since you don't see why anyone would even want HDR on the web.

This is going on for too long. Maybe you can somehow find a way to process all HDR content so that it's reasonable (i.e never makes the surrounding SDR GUI look grey, never makes bright pots which are bright enough to hurt) across all screens imaginable and all contexts. Maybe. I have my doubts, but go ahead.

Convince the web standards bodies and browser implementers and transform the world into one where HDR on the web is perfect and never causes issues.

But until that's done, there's a simple solution: Just don't support HDR. Until your hypothetical perfect solution is universally implemented, it does more harm than good on the web and should not be supported.

I don't see why anyone would want HDR on the web in its current form.

Well the reason I was talking about limits that way is because it's something screens already do when displaying HDR content. They can't go full power over much area, and the bigger you go the dimmer your limit gets. So repurposing those existing algorithms with some tweaking.

It's not very hard on a technical level.

And no it doesn't have to be universal and perfect to reach the point that HDR is a benefit. There are some blatant flaws that need fixing, and just a few fixes would get us a lot closer.

It has to be universally not harmful.

Again, go convince standards bodies and browser implementers to implement those algorithms after doing studies to demonstrate that it fixes the issue. Until then, I just don't want it in my browser.