News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Racism at a gaming company by mtrimpe on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @05:05PM (#4604289)
> Yet another nail in the coffin of his credibility.

Please understand that the anger such treatment (validly) brings about is incredibly hard to suppress.

In that situation it's really hard to walk the line between expressing your emotions in such a way that it evokes similar emotions in others and not expressing so much anger that you will be classified as just bitter and vindictive.

Re:Racism at a gaming company by saraid216 on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @05:47PM (#4604548)
> Please understand that the anger such treatment (validly) brings about is incredibly hard to suppress.

And also, why should it be suppressed? Integration doesn't work if both parties pretend to be nice but are prepared to find a more underhanded way to stab each other in the back once the negotiations have ended.

Re:Racism at a gaming company by gizmo686 on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @06:48PM (#4604808)
Integration works fine if both parties pretend to play nice. The not nice people die off, and the young generation never thinks of being not nice.
Re:Racism at a gaming company by saraid216 on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @07:10PM (#4604883)
This deserves an analysis far more nuanced than I'm able to deliver. How has the integration of Italians versus Irish gone in New York? I can't answer that, because I've never studied it. I suspect it went better than the integration of whites and blacks in the South. Why? I can't answer that for the same reason.

I suspect we're both right for different reasons under different circumstances, and it would be fascinating to actually go through the histories and anthropologies to understand what those reasons and circumstances might be.