I don't know my guy, your system isn't exactly top notch for most people - I don't think you need to look very hard to see that if you try.
Random examples:
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/OECD_hea... - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Life_exp...
There's something very very wrong here when your paying that much per capita and a lot of people are still struggling.
In fact they actively try to provide as little care as possible. It's a negative signal, not a positive one as you seem to think.
> The services are top notch
Healthcare is a plethora of services, ranging from something as simple as a blood draw to open-heart surgery. I can tell you from experience that many diagnostic services are definitely NOT top notch, and the service of getting billed after is an absolute nightmare.
Examine your priors.
The demand for healthcare procedures is unlimited.
Instead queues are used to limit access to expensive procedures, because waiting lists are the only solution that is palatable to voters.
Although in theory queues shouldn't actually reduce total costs (just delay the costs?)
Can you provide evidence of this? The services are top notch, and over 90% of people have health insurance. Moreover, in other single payer systems (Canada, Poland) I keep hearing about months long wait for procedures until you go private/out-of-pocket.