It is -- it's a thoughtful and thorough investigation of a perfectly legitimate area of scientific study -- but it also smells like the sort of thing the hormone-drunk adolescents that rule Reddit go nuts for, so surely some people can be forgiven for dismissing it out-of-hand, especially given recent history here.
If we want a community of intelligent, civil posters, asking its citizens to look beyond titles and examine the articles themselves seems like a reasonable expectation.
Re:What Do Women Want?
by TooMuchNick on Saturday January 31, 2009 @06:48PM
(#460259)
Since I'm spending a lot of time on 4chan lately as research for an article, I got a fit of giggles when you mentioned the hormone-drunk adolescents that rule...Reddit.
Re:What Do Women Want?
by xenophanes on Saturday January 31, 2009 @06:24PM
(#460235)
It'd be a better topic if the title wasn't linkbait that encouraged off topic comments. And the article didn't start with a big kiss picture and a statement about making animal porn.
BTW, calling my comment superficial violates your guidelines. It's not civil. It's not an argument. It's an insult.
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html