Re:We should all be using dependency cooldowns
by jcalvinowens on Friday November 21, 2025 @01:58PM
(#46007641)
I'm simply saying I think the policy you're proposing is bad. It is completely bizarre to me you're trying to frame that as a semantic argument.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We should all be using dependency cooldowns
by woodruffw on Friday November 21, 2025 @02:14PM
(#46007818)
I'm not saying it's a semantic argument. I'm saying that the policy isn't universal, whereas your argument appears to hinge on me thinking that it is. But this seems to have run its course.
Re:We should all be using dependency cooldowns
by jcalvinowens on Friday November 21, 2025 @02:20PM
(#46007888)
That's a semantic argument.
Me saying your proposed policy is bad is in no way predicated on any assumption you intended it to be "universal". Quite the opposite: the last thing anybody needs at work is yet another poorly justified bullshit policy they have to constantly request an "exception" to to do their job...