Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by vkou on Friday November 21, 2025 @12:51PM
(#46006833)
A US company is free to cut off service to whatever foreigner it wants, just like a foreign country is free to ban whatever US firm it wants from operating in it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by jatsek on Friday November 21, 2025 @01:15PM
(#46007081)
Please look up what happened to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras or Costa Rica when they tried banning whatever US firm they wanted.
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by vkou on Friday November 21, 2025 @01:48PM
(#46007536)
The EU has more weight than Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Cuba, or Grenada.
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by lucb1e on Saturday November 22, 2025 @11:51AM
(#46016085)
Can you link an article or at least mention some more keywords? A super vague search query based on this information, like "costa rica banning us firm consequences", isn't turning up anything that sounds relevant
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by HDThoreaun on Saturday November 22, 2025 @04:35PM
(#46018474)
They all freed themselves from their captors and became sovereign countries?
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by hn_acker on Friday November 21, 2025 @01:07PM
(#46006999)
The US government is not free to use frivolous sanctions to indirectly make payment processors stop serving a foreigner.
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by gusfoo on Friday November 21, 2025 @02:00PM
(#46007671)
> The US government is not free to use frivolous sanctions to indirectly make payment processors stop serving a foreigner.
You may regard them as such, but they are not in any sense frivolous. It is the law that if-x-then-y, it's not a discretionary item that one interprets. And to be clear, these are not "indirectly" making payment processors stop serving the person, it is very clearly direct and you do not, as a company, have a choice in the matter.
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by vkou on Friday November 21, 2025 @08:27PM
(#46011199)
1. The law in question does not compel the US Government to bend over backwards to protect foreign nationals from prosecution for war crimes.
2. The US Government plays incredibly fast and loose with laws that compel foreign policy from it. If its adherence to them is discretionary, you can absolutely piss on it for being discretionary in this case.
Re:How a French judge was digitally cut off by the USA
by pessimizer on Friday November 21, 2025 @01:18PM
(#46007122)
It definitely is.