News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by mlmonkey on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:16AM (#45994263)
You do know that every color copier comes with the ability to identify US currency and would refuse to copy it? And that every color printer leaves a pattern of faint yellow dots on every printout that uniquely identifies the printer?
Re:Nano Banana Pro by sabatonfan on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:21AM (#45994330)
Is this something strictly with the US currency notes or is the same true for other countries currency as well?
Re:Nano Banana Pro by SaberTail on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:36AM (#45994524)
It's most notes, and for EU and US notes (as well as some others), it's based on a certain pattern on the bills: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation
Re:Nano Banana Pro by mlmonkey on Saturday November 22, 2025 @12:34PM (#46016492)
Of course, countries with plastic currency notes (like Australia) don't have to worry about this because their notes incorporate hard-to-counterfeit features like transparent windows.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by potsandpans on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:20AM (#45994318)
And that's not a good thing.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by mlmonkey on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:27AM (#45994405)
I'm just responding to this by OP:

> Were politicians 20 years ago as overreative they'd have demanded Photoshop leave a trace on anything it edited.

Re:Nano Banana Pro by oblio on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:30AM (#45994446)
It depends on how you're looking at it. For the people not getting handed counterfeit currency, it's probably a good thing.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by fwip on Thursday November 20, 2025 @12:02PM (#45994836)
Also probably good for the people trying to counterfeit money with a printer, better not to end up in jail for that.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by fwip on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:28AM (#45994413)
Why not? Like, genuinely.
Re:Nano Banana Pro by potsandpans on Thursday November 20, 2025 @01:06PM (#45995631)
I generally don't think that's it's good or just for a government to collude with manufacturers to track/trace it's citizens without consent or notice. And even if notice was given, I'd still be against it

The arguments put forward by people generally I don't find compelling -- for example, in this thread around protecting against counterfeit.

The "force" applied to address these concerns is totally out of proportion. Whenever these discussions happen, I feel like they descend into a general viewpoint, "if we could technically solve any possible crime, we should do everything in our power to solve it."

I'm against this viewpoint, and acknowledge that that means _some crime_ occurs. That's acceptable to me. I don't feel that society is correctly structured to "treat" crime appropriately, and technology has outpaced our ability to holistically address it.

Generally, I don't see (speaking for the US) the highest incarceration rate in the world to be a good thing, or being generally effective, and I don't believe that increasing that number will change outcomes.

Re:Nano Banana Pro by fwip on Thursday November 20, 2025 @04:40PM (#45998156)
Gotcha, thanks for the explanation. I think that personally, I agree with your stance that it's a bad kind of thing for government to do, but in practice I find that I'm in favor of the effects of this specific law. (Perhaps I need to do some thinking.)
Re:Nano Banana Pro by wing-_-nuts on Thursday November 20, 2025 @12:36PM (#45995258)
Nope, having a stable, trusted currency trumps whatever productive use one could have for a anonymous, currency reproducing color printer