Google boss warns 'no company is going to be immune' if AI bubble bursts

Re:Google boss warns 'no company is going to be immune' if A... by philipallstar on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @06:56AM (#45978506)

There will be some people like that (e.g. middle class kid has terrible work ethic; communicates it to his kid and now that kid has bad habits), but in the large it's more about culture than individual habits.

If one person doesn't show up on time, that's a bad habit. If no one shows up on time then that's a cultural issue[0], and much more devastating.

As an example, Zim dug itself a huge hole by kicking out the productive white farmers in 2000-2001. One of the key issues charitable foreign people trying to help Zimbabwe addressed was in re-educating the local population in why it matters that all the planting work is done by a certain time of year. The white farmers had all that knowledge, and cultural experience of hard work, and had made Zimbabwe the breadbasket of Africa.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_time

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google boss warns 'no company is going to be immune' if A... by varnaud on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @08:48AM (#45979459)

The productive decline of the farms is because of the fast-track land reform. Before 2000-2001, there were no effective national programs to prepare the people to run the farms. The opposition party was gaining ground, and so to stay in power, the ruling party rushed the land reform with no preparation.

Not sure how this is a relevant example of a culture that don't value punctuality.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google boss warns 'no company is going to be immune' if A... by philipallstar on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @10:20AM (#45980653)

Well, for the reason I said. You've reframed it in a way that removes responsibility from everyone involved, but that's just an example of how to reframe things. It's not actually useful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google boss warns 'no company is going to be immune' if A... by tbrownaw on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @10:48PM (#45988710)

> You've reframed it in a way that removes responsibility

No, the comment you're replying to pretty clearly put the responsibility on the party that "rushed the land reform with no preparation".

And also accurately noted that a nation seizing capital and redistributing it to people who don't know how to use it is rather different from what had been the thread topic of personal skills / useful habits being purportedly unattainable by the lower classes without explicit instruction.

[ Parent | on HN ]