News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A down detector for down detector's down detector.

Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by rocauc on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @03:07AM (#45977005)
yes, downdetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetector is available.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by sixtyj on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @03:31AM (#45977145)
Is there a length limit for domain names? :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @03:41AM (#45977196)
Yes, according to RFC 1035 section 2.3.4 [0], it's 255 octets. Long answer written by a human: https://superuser.com/a/1843870

[0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1035#section-2.3.4

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by AceJohnny2 on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @03:15AM (#45977044)
i've reached semantic satiation
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by thenthenthen on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @05:38AM (#45977976)
Time for updetector.com! (On the plus side, this could detect if itself was up!)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A down detector for down detector's down detector by danirod on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @05:00AM (#45977745)
Well, that was fast.

https://downdetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetector....

[ Parent | on HN ]