News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Solving a Million-Step LLM Task with Zero Errors. Parent comment

Re:Solving a Million-Step LLM Task with Zero Errors by harpiaharpyja on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @08:07PM (#45974597)
If air was highly conductive that analogy would totally hold.

"If there’s a cut in my wire’s insulation, the device won’t get enough voltage" doesn't follow from: "voltage is like water pressure in pipes"

So I don't really get your point.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solving a Million-Step LLM Task with Zero Errors by pinkmuffinere on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @11:28PM (#45975847)
> "If there’s a cut in my wire’s insulation, the device won’t get enough voltage" doesn't follow from: "voltage is like water pressure in pipes"

I absolutely agree! In the same way, "an LLM can solve complex problems if it breaks them into subtasks" doesn't follow from "NASA breaks large projects into smaller parts"

[ Parent | on HN ]