Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by scotty79 on Monday October 01, 2012 @02:17AM
(#4595590)
I don't really get what people have against seat-belts.
Apart from "Nobody is going to tell me what I must do in MY car!" and some people thinking that being tossed out of your car is actually preferable scenario in most accidents.
I think there's too little data about road accidents publicly available. I think all documentation from police investigations of road accidents should be anonymized and made public after some time.
Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by reinout on Monday October 01, 2012 @09:08AM
(#4596734)
The number of people killed in traffic accidents in the Netherlands has dropped 80% since the 1972 high of 3000+/year. It is now at 640/year.
The main reason being given is seat belts for drivers and helmets for moped users. Info in Dutch from the official statistics bureau: http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/gezondheid-welzijn/publi...
Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by stouset on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @04:58PM
(#4609654)
One important distinction here is that the health benefits from cycling, even without a helmet, outweigh the dangers by a factor between 7-1 and 20-1, depending on the study.
Any policy which reduces the number of people who would otherwise choose to bicycle is de facto worse for people's health. If mandatory helmet laws decreases the number of bike trips by even one, it's a net loss.
Though it's hardly a new development. Seat belts have been mandatory for decades. People complain about safety restrictions like these at first but seat belt laws have been around long enough to reduce the complaints to a mere mumble. So may it happen with helmet laws.