News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A new search engine by lacker on Monday October 01, 2012 @01:39AM (#4595486)
The reason it's hard to compete in search engines is that an MVP is pretty tough. If you can't type in [espn] and get to ESPN, then your search engine hasn't hit minimum viable product yet. But it's not that easy to get to the point where these "navigational" searches work. You probably can't do it with just a few people and a few months. It requires millions of up-front investment, like Cuil or Blekko.

So, if you want to build a new search engine, you need a more radical vision for what you are leaving out. Either you are leaving out the vast majority of the internet, or you are leaving out the vast majority of queries. Focusing on the areas where the press has dinged Google like privacy or an API won't get you there.

Re:A new search engine by orangethirty on Monday October 01, 2012 @07:27AM (#4596323)
For the first months (years?), it will be exclusive for hackers. Thus the curl approach to invites. Non-hackers wont get what curl is.
Re:A new search engine by ElliotH on Monday October 01, 2012 @10:03AM (#4596990)
And those of us who cba to leave our browsers will quickly spoof our user agent and get an invite anyway.
Re:A new search engine by orangethirty on Monday October 01, 2012 @10:09AM (#4597025)
I know that. It is merely a filter to get the right people, not a wall.
Re:A new search engine by lacker on Thursday October 04, 2012 @08:51PM (#4615190)
Being exclusive to hackers doesn't really help. Hackers still sometimes want to search for [espn]. You have to either drop a lot of web pages, or drop a lot of queries.