Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by twodave on Sunday November 16, 2025 @06:47PM
(#45949577)
It’s called absurdity. It’s funny because it’s obviously not true, and also funny because of the undertones that it’s a clever way to get horny teenagers to study physics who really just want to see the photos.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by makeitdouble on Sunday November 16, 2025 @07:35PM
(#45949855)
It would be absurd if pop stars by defintion could not explain semiconductor physics. Like how a snake wearing boots is absurd.
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by ChrisMarshallNY on Sunday November 16, 2025 @08:18PM
(#45950053)
Dr. Brian May comes to mind...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_May#Scientific_career
Maybe not so absurd.
Also, Todd Rundgren used to be a registered Apple developer. We'd see him moseying around the WWDC, every year.
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by twodave on Sunday November 16, 2025 @09:43PM
(#45950422)
You are being pedantic, but I’ll play along. Absurd has multiple meanings. It can mean nonsensical, but it can also mean utterly ridiculous or silly. Under those other meanings I believe the pop-star-physics-professor still qualifies.
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by makeitdouble on Monday November 17, 2025 @12:34AM
(#45951079)
It sounds pedantic, but "absurd" is fundamentally different from "rare". A lot of baggage comes from flagging something as absurd, instead of just unexpected or uncommon. Winning the lottery isn't absurd, having 3 pairs of some chromosome isn't either, and being a successful pop singer with an academic background isn't either, it's just rare.
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by twodave on Monday November 17, 2025 @06:40AM
(#45952757)
It IS pedantic, because we are talking not of pop stars in general, but Britney Spears specifically.
Re:Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
by netdevphoenix on Monday November 17, 2025 @10:28AM
(#45954418)
Very heteronormative even for 2000