Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by baddox on Sunday September 30, 2012 @05:25PM
(#4594229)
Most of the "anti-helmet" studies and arguments I've seen aren't particularly anti-helmet in principle, but rather just make the case that the benefits of wearing a helmet apply equally to pedestrians and automobile drivers/passengers. The argument isn't that helmets can prevent head injuries while riding a bike. The argument is that if there are laws or social stigma around bicycle helmets, then they should apply equally to pedestrians and automobile drivers/passengers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by cbr on Sunday September 30, 2012 @07:51PM
(#4594676)
> the benefits of wearing a helmet apply equally to pedestrians and automobile drivers/passengers
Cycling is about six times more likely to kill you, per hour, than driving. So while helmets in cars would help some, the case for them on bikes is stronger.
Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by corporalagumbo on Sunday September 30, 2012 @09:36PM
(#4594915)
I would also like to see some evidence for this wild claim.
Re:To Encourage Biking, Cities Lose the Helmets
by RegEx on Monday October 01, 2012 @05:21AM
(#4595974)
This thread is full of "evidence I've seen" without sources, on both sides of the argument.