Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by ghaff on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @09:26PM
(#45909752)
Apple Watch also that no one not a boomer wears watches any longer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by broodbucket on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @09:57PM
(#45909977)
Yeah this is out of touch. They're definitely still popular, and besides, older generations exist and their product preferences are valid
Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by LeoPanthera on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @09:44PM
(#45909874)
You're kidding, right? It's ubiquitous. I see it everywhere. It's almost unusual to see someone wearing a watch that isn't one.
Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by mariusor on Thursday November 13, 2025 @01:51AM
(#45911583)
Except for all the young, fit people that want to track their workouts and health. Maybe the time of watches that just tell time has passed - I would argue even against that with the continuing existence of Swiss luxury brands - but watch as a small health monitor is still in full force.
Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by ghaff on Thursday November 13, 2025 @09:09AM
(#45915045)
To be honest I usually wear a cheap Timex even though I have an Apple Watch because charging is a task. Wear for hiking. Care less about regular fitness tracking.
Re:£220 'for a cut-up sock' — Apples's new iPhone Pocket rid...
by mariusor on Thursday November 13, 2025 @09:44AM
(#45915465)
People that care about battery life probably use something more sporty like the new Suunto's (I get about 2weeks+ of batter life). However the smart watch health features are nowhere near as good.