News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs. Parent comment

Re:FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs by necovek on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @01:01AM (#45896825)
If they both funded vulnerability scanning and vulnerability fixing (if they don't want to do it in-house, they can sponsor the upstream team), which is to me the obvious "how", I am not sure why you believe there is only one way to do it.

It's about accountability! Who really gets to do it once those who ship it to customers care, is on them to figure out (though note that maintainers will have some burden to review, integrate and maintain the change anyway).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FFmpeg to Google: Fund us or stop sending bugs by tpmoney on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @02:13AM (#45897210)
They regularly submit code and they buy consulting from the ffmpeg maintainers according to the maintainer's own website. It seems to me like they're already funding fixes in ffmpeg, and really everyone is just mad that this particular issue didn't come with a fix. Which is honestly not a great look for convincing corporations to invest resources into contributing to upstream. If regular patches and buying dev time from the maintainers isn't enough to avoid getting grief for "not contributing" then why bother spending that time and money in the first place?
[ Parent | on HN ]