News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open source has a growing problem with LLM generated issues by xeeeeeeeeeeenu on Sunday November 09, 2025 @11:47PM (#45872527)
Unfortunately, LLMs empower "contributors" who can't be bothered to put in any effort and who don't care about the negative impact of their actions on the maintainers.

The open-source community, generally speaking, is a high-trust society and I'm afraid that LLM abuse may turn it into a low-trust society. The end result will be worse than the status quo for everyone involved.

Re:Open source has a growing problem with LLM generated issues by wombatpm on Monday November 10, 2025 @12:22AM (#45872708)
AI seems like a rerun of the Eternal September problem that eventually killed internet news groups and a lot of email discussion lists.
Re:Open source has a growing problem with LLM generated issues by wilya7 on Monday November 10, 2025 @01:03AM (#45872912)
Everything is collapsing toward a low-trust default. At the end of this trajectory, we rediscover that the analog world becomes valuable precisely because it can't be infinitely replicated.

Authenticity becomes the foundational currency.

But everyone must master AI tools to stay relevant. The brilliant engineer who refuses AI-generated PR by principle will get replaced. Every 18-24 months, as capabilities double, required skills shift. Specialization diminishes. Learning velocity becomes the only durable advantage. These people cannot learn new tricks.

Those who cannot question their assumptions cannot self-correct and will be replaced. The future belongs to the humble, the fluid, and the resilient. 60% of HN users is going toward a very tough time, and I am being very charitable with this assumption.

Re:Open source has a growing problem with LLM generated issues by grayhatter on Monday November 10, 2025 @11:23AM (#45877513)
> But everyone must master AI tools to stay relevant.

This is FUD sold to you by snake oil salesmen.

> I am being very charitable with this assumption.

Don't forget how humble you're being too!

Your comment as a whole feels very disappointing, because you started with an interesting thought about the currency of trust; before you ruined it by spreading FUD without evidence or argument.