Re:How the UK lost its shipbuilding industry
by jay_kyburz on Sunday November 09, 2025 @11:28PM
(#45872442)
Yeah, so much drama around the gigantic submarines, we should be building water drones of some kind.
Re:How the UK lost its shipbuilding industry
by XorNot on Monday November 10, 2025 @02:45AM
(#45873482)
We literally are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_Shark_(submarine)
But they don't do everything, and frankly drones are very overstated: they're not magic, and the idea of fielding masses of things when your adversary is at least China backed is pretty farcical: we can't ever win a conflict on cheap mass production because we don't have it.
So a handful of hard hitting long range weapons is going to be a key part of the strategy: because if we can't hit the factories, we can't win period.
Re:How the UK lost its shipbuilding industry
by dwd on Monday November 10, 2025 @12:23AM
(#45872717)
During Talisman Sabre 25, a RCAF C-17 air-dropped a Himars and some ADF personnel on Christmas Island, simulated a firing and then left.
Pushes the defensive line quite a bit further out from the mainland, and you could potentially cover choke points for a naval invasion from the north.
Re:How the UK lost its shipbuilding industry
by rswail on Monday November 10, 2025 @07:50AM
(#45875454)
I didn't know that. That's actually impressive, both strategically and in terms of our readiness and capability.
That puts Jakarta in range. I'm sure the Indonesian military took note as well.
Plus we've got Tomahawks now, that's 2500km range, sea launched.
I saw a whitepaper that suggested Australia should give up shipbuilding in exchange for drones and electronic warfare. The goal being to present a front like Ukraine does. Bristle with weapons and guarantee that any invasion would be 10 times more costly than anything gained. It was interesting at least.