News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Letter from Tim Cook on Maps by burke on Friday September 28, 2012 @01:25PM (#4586691)
When it works, it's better. However, it does not work as often.

I was stranded at O'Hare earlier this week, and United put me up at the "Crown Plaza", according to my hotel voucher. I searched for "Crown Plaza" in iOS6 maps, and was suddenly transported to Vancouver. In Google Maps, it correctly surmised I was actually looking for the nearby "Crowne Plaza".

iOS6 maps is 95% as good as google maps, but the missing 5% really hurts.

Re:A Letter from Tim Cook on Maps by nsxwolf on Friday September 28, 2012 @02:33PM (#4587074)
Your experience also represents the bulk of the problems I've had. I'm in the Chicagoland area, and the POI data and roads have been pretty good. But the search doesn't seem to prioritize nearby locations. If your search string exactly matches the name of some town, anywhere in the world, it tends to give you that result.
Re:A Letter from Tim Cook on Maps by dangoldin on Friday September 28, 2012 @05:34PM (#4587898)
Echoes my experience as well. I searched for a nearby street and ended up getting the same street further away. It directed me away from Manhattan and into another borough.
Re:A Letter from Tim Cook on Maps by bane on Friday September 28, 2012 @02:21PM (#4587008)
And making up that 5% is going to take 95% of the work.
Re:A Letter from Tim Cook on Maps by cobrophy on Saturday September 29, 2012 @06:14AM (#4589203)
Also the 5% isn't evenly distributed. So for some people the 5% is going to look like 20% while for others it looks like 1%