I Love OCaml - Hackdot

Re:I Love OCaml by gigatexal on Saturday November 08, 2025 @02:19AM (#45854820)

That makes sense. But LinkedIn lists are horrible for cache efficient things no? I think there was an article on HN from a Golang perspective padding structs or something such that they are efficient wrt to cache hits.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by rkomorn on Saturday November 08, 2025 @02:26AM (#45854846)

> But LinkedIn lists are horrible for cache efficient things no?

LinkedIn Lists you say? (Sorry. (But not that sorry.))

Edit meta sidenote: in this modern meme world, it's virtually impossible to know if a typo is a typo or just a meme you haven't heard of yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by gigatexal on Saturday November 08, 2025 @04:31AM (#45855438)

lol my phone autocorrected ugh.

But you know what I mean. Some grace would be nice.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by rkomorn on Saturday November 08, 2025 @05:08AM (#45855605)

I know. It was just too hard to pass up. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by gigatexal on Saturday November 08, 2025 @06:18AM (#45855889)

Well you got me. I audibly groaned and slapped my forehead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by stirfish on Saturday November 08, 2025 @01:45PM (#45858915)

LinkedIn lists will tell you they contain one new element, but you have to click on a link and scroll through their suggested new elements to see what it is

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by rkomorn on Saturday November 08, 2025 @01:48PM (#45858936)

Do they also always end with an element that tells you what the LinkedIn list taught it about B2B sales?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Love OCaml by mrkeen on Saturday November 08, 2025 @05:32PM (#45860647)

They are, but you don't tend to keep them around in memory long enough. Start consuming the front before you produce the back.

[ Parent | on HN ]