Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by fph on Friday November 07, 2025 @03:42PM
(#45850883)
The Latex example should include at least a math formula.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by kccqzy on Friday November 07, 2025 @06:23PM
(#45852494)
And the Haskell example doesn't even include common operators like <$> or <*> or <>. I would've also expected some fancier arrows like =<< or >>>.
Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by sayyadirfanali on Saturday November 08, 2025 @01:37AM
(#45854640)
if you're looking for those Haskell operators, you'd find them in the huge banner at the start. maybe i should also add them in the illustrations too.
Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by kccqzy on Saturday November 08, 2025 @10:55AM
(#45857565)
That unfortunately doesn't show them in context.
Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by sayyadirfanali on Saturday November 08, 2025 @01:38AM
(#45854642)
agreed. formulae are essential LaTeX. are there any particular glyphs compositions which you'd suggest?
Re:Myna: Monospace typeface designed for symbol-heavy progra...
by fph on Saturday November 08, 2025 @08:50AM
(#45856656)
Thanks! For something more complex, I suggest a moderately complex formula with parentheses and superscripts like $f \in \mathcal{C}^0([a,b])$, an equation delimited by \[...\], and maybe a macro declaration with parameters like \newcommand\halves[1]{\frac{#1}{2}}.