Unless this is all a prelude to their master plan to pull an iOS in W9, it seems like a highly prudent move. Microsoft is a company, and needs to remain competitive against Apple, and they best achieve this by simplifying the front-end. But they don't seem to be forgetting their expert-user roots.
The only question for me now is how moddable the Metro interface will be. I think it would be smart if Microsoft left it relatively open for expert users to experiment with.
Metro apps will not be available from elsewhere.
> For now it seems like Microsoft is doing what Apple has
> never considered - building a streamlined frontend
> interface with a certified app store so casual users can
> safely and easily access a wide range of software, and
> maintaining a fully tinker-able backend and not closing
> off other software distribution channels for expert users.
Interestingly, model that you just described works fine on OS X and have been this way for more than a year now.I got quite a jolt when I couldn't install Emacs on my new MBP with Mountain Lion at first. (I am not a Mac user. This is my first apple computer).
I had to tweak something in control panel to be able to install the downloaded dmg file.
How long before that option disappears? I don't know. But I am afraid it will, some day.
Isn't that exactly what Apple has done on OS X with the Mac App Store?
On ARM-based tablets running Windows "RT" (that is Windows 8, without the legacy, without the desktop), Windows only ships with Metro and the AppStore is the only place to get apps.
On x86-based systems, you can fool around in desktop-land as you are used to and install anything you like.
So the answer is yes and no, all depending on platform.