To be honest, it’s quite surprising to me that they were let free… and that they didn’t end up in black sites being subjected to “enhanced interrogations” until they “admit” to being drug traffickers, killing JFK, and stealing Christmas.

"...for their home countries to prosecute"

Does not imply a belief of innocence.

GMAFB. The US is famous for using 'extraordinary rendition' to take custody of people it deems terrorists and either try them or hold them in isolation at military camps. Do you really buy the line that they're being 'sent home to be prosecuted' by the same countries that are condemning these strikes? It seems far more likely that they're being sent home because they don't want to put them in front of a judge.

Is vague enough to mean either thing which in and of itself is a red flag. "To face justice" is both a phrase this administration would use and is more concrete.

That’s a meaningless claim and statement unless they somehow compel their home countries to prosecute them

> worthy of execution without due process

Quite the fascist take you got there, buddy.

edit: My bad. On closer reading I believe you might have said that tongue-in-cheek. Reading intent in text is hard.